- Is a 138 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants.
In addition, it also includes the maternally inherited mitochondrial genome.
Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of unilateral or bilateral non-syndromic hearing loss.
Is not ideal for individuals suspected to have syndromic hearing loss. Please refer to our Syndromic Hearing Loss Panel.
The Blueprint Genetics Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Panel (test code EA0201):
Read about our accreditations, certifications and CE-marked IVD medical devices here.
Refer to the most current version of ICD-10-CM manual for a complete list of ICD-10 codes.
- Blood (min. 1ml) in an EDTA tube
- Extracted DNA, min. 2 μg in TE buffer or equivalent
- Saliva (Please see Sample Requirements for accepted saliva kits)
Label the sample tube with your patient’s name, date of birth and the date of sample collection.
We do not accept DNA samples isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. In addition, if the patient is affected with a hematological malignancy, DNA extracted from a non-hematological source (e.g. skin fibroblasts) is strongly recommended.
Please note that, in rare cases, mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) variants may not be detectable in blood or saliva in which case DNA extracted from post-mitotic tissue such as skeletal muscle may be a better option.
Read more about our sample requirements here.
Sensorineural hearing loss is a genetically very heterogenous group of phenotypes varying in severity and causes. Non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss is a partial or total loss of hearing that occurs without other associated clinical findings. Hearing loss can be unilateral or bilateral and it can be stable or progressive. In addition, specific types of non-syndromic hearing loss may show distinctive pattern of hearing loss for high, middle or low tones. Some 60-70% of congenital hereditary hearing impairment have non-syndromic origin, and the prevalence is estimated to be 3-4:10,000 neonates and increases with age. In many populations, mutations in GJB2 are the most prevalent explaining up to 50% of all non-syndromic hearing losses. Non-syndromic hearing loss is genetically heterogenous, as more than >60 autosomal dominant loci and >90 autosomal recessive loci have been identified (http://www.hereditaryhearingloss.org).
Genes in the Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Panel and their clinical significance
|ACTG1*||Deafness, Baraitser-Winter syndrome||AD||27||47|
|ATP2B2||Sensorineural hearing loss||AD||3||7|
|BSND||Sensorineural deafness with mild renal dysfunction, Bartter syndrome||AR||10||20|
|CD164||Deafness, autosomal dominant 66||AD||1||1|
|CDC14A||Deafness, autosomal recessive 105||AR||7||9|
|CDH23||Deafness, Usher syndrome, type 1D||AR||94||358|
|CIB2||Deafness, Usher syndrome type IJ||AR||5||18|
|COL11A2||Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, Deafness, Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, Fibrochondrogenesis, Stickler syndrome type 3 (non-ocular)||AD/AR||29||57|
|COL4A6||Deafness, with cochlear malformation||XL||11||5|
|DCDC2||Deafness, Nephronophthisis, Sclerosing cholangitis, neonatal||AR||13||9|
|DFNB31||Usher syndrome, type 2D, Deafness, autosomal recessive 31||AR||12||31|
|DIAPH1||Seizures, cortical blindness, and microcephaly syndrome (SCBMS), Deafness, autosomal dominant 1||AD/AR||10||15|
|DIAPH3||Non-syndromic sensorineural deafness||AD||1||9|
|DMXL2||Deafness, autosomal dominant, 71, Polyendocrine-polyneuropathy syndrome, Epileptic encephalopathy, early infantile||AD/AR||2||6|
|DSPP||Dentin dysplasia, Dentinogenesis imperfecta, Deafness, with dentinogenesis imperfecta||AD||11||53|
|EPS8L2||Deafness, autosomal recessive 106||AR||2||2|
|ESPN*||Deafness, Deafness, autosomal recessive 36||AD/AR||12||15|
|EYA4||Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), Deafness, autosomal dominant 10||AD||15||28|
|GJB2||Deafness, Bart-Pumphrey syndrome, Keratoderma, palmoplantar, with deafness, Vohwinkel syndrome, Hystrix-like ichthyosis with deafness, Keratitis-icthyosis-deafness syndrome||AD/AR/Digenic||133||405|
|GJB3||Deafness, Erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 1, Deafness, autosomal dominant 2B||AD/AR||11||40|
|GJB6||Deafness, autosomal dominant 3B, Ectodermal dysplasia, hidrotic (Clouston syndrome), Deafness, autosomal recessive 1B||AD/AR||10||33|
|GPSM2||Deafness, Chudley-McCullough syndrome||AR||18||11|
|GRHL2||Ectodermal dysplasia/short stature syndrome, Deafness, autosomal dominant 28, Corneal dystrophy, posterior polymorphous||AD/AR||12||12|
|KARS||Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Deafness, autosomal recessive||AR||9||23|
|LOXHD1||Deafness, autosomal recessive 77||AR||26||60|
|MET||Deafness, Renal cell carcinoma, papillary, Osteofibrous dysplasia, susceptibility to||AD/AR||20||34|
|MPZL2||Sensorineural hearing loss||AR||4|
|MT-ATP6||Neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Ataxia and polyneuropathy, adult-onset, Cardiomyopathy, infantile hypertrophic, Leigh syndrome, Striatonigral degeneration, infantile, mitochondrial||Mitochondrial||19|
|MT-ATP8||Cardiomyopathy, apical hypertrophic, and neuropathy, Cardiomyopathy, infantile hypertrophic||Mitochondrial||4|
|MT-CO1||Myoglobinuria, recurrent, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Sideroblastic anemia, Cytochrome C oxidase deficiency, Deafness, mitochondrial||Mitochondrial||17|
|MT-CO2||Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency||Mitochondrial||8|
|MT-CO3||Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy||Mitochondrial||9|
|MT-ND1||Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia||Mitochondrial||21|
|MT-ND2||Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency||Mitochondrial||6|
|MT-ND3||Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency||Mitochondrial||7|
|MT-ND4||Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency||Mitochondrial||11|
|MT-ND4L||Leber hereditary optic neuropathy||Mitochondrial||2|
|MT-ND5||Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency||Mitochondrial||19|
|MT-ND6||Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Oncocytoma, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency||Mitochondrial||16|
|MT-TC||Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes||Mitochondrial||3|
|MT-TE||Diabetes-deafness syndrome, Mitochondrial myopathy, infantile, transient, Mitochondrial myopathy with diabetes||Mitochondrial||5|
|MT-TF||Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Nephropathy, tubulointerstitial, Encephalopathy, mitochondrial, Epilepsy, mitochondrial, Myopathy, mitochondrial, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes||Mitochondrial||7|
|MT-TK||Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Leigh syndrome||Mitochondrial||5|
|MT-TL1||Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency, Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Diabetes-deafness syndrome, Cyclic vomiting syndrome, SIDS, susceptibility to||Mitochondrial||14|
|MT-TL2||Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder, Progressive external ophthalmoplegia, Mitochondrial Myopathy, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes||Mitochondrial||5|
|MT-TM||Leigh syndrome, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder||Mitochondrial||1|
|MT-TN||Progressive external ophthalmoplegia, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder||Mitochondrial||3|
|MT-TQ||Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder||Mitochondrial||2|
|MT-TS1||Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes||Mitochondrial||10|
|MT-TS2||Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder||Mitochondrial||2|
|MT-TV||Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), Leigh syndrome, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes||Mitochondrial||3|
|MT-TW||Leigh syndrome, Myopathy, mitochondrial||Mitochondrial||8|
|MT-TY||Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder||Mitochondrial||4|
|MYH14||Peripheral neuropathy, myopathy, hoarseness, and hearing loss, Deafness, autosomal dominant 4||AD||7||44|
|MYH9||Sebastian syndrome, May-Hegglin anomaly, Epstein syndrome, Fechtner syndrome, Macrothrombocytopenia and progressive sensorineural deafness, Deafness, autosomal dominant 17||AD||25||117|
|MYO15A||Deafness, autosomal recessive 3||AR||97||235|
|MYO6||Deafness, autosomal dominant, 22, Deafness, autosomal recessive 37||AD/AR||24||68|
|MYO7A||Deafness, autosomal dominant 11, Usher syndrome, type I, Deafness, autosomal recessive 2||AD/AR||239||515|
|NARS2||Combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency||AR||12||12|
|OTOGL||Deafness, autosomal recessive 84B||AR||26||23|
|PCDH15||Deafness, Usher syndrome, type 1D||AR/Digenic||113||118|
|PNPT1*||Combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency, 13, Deafness, autosomal recessive 70||AR||11||13|
|PRPS1*||Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase I superactivity, Arts syndrome, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, X-linked recessive, 5, Deafness, X-linked 1||XL||27||32|
|RDX*||Deafness, autosomal recessive 24||AR||6||10|
|S1PR2||Deafness, autosomal recessive 68||AR||2||3|
|SIX1||Deafness, Branchiootic syndrome, Branchiootorenal syndrome||AD||11||19|
|SLC26A4||Deafness, Pendred syndrome, Enlarged vestibular aqueduct||AR||181||548|
|SLC26A5||Deafness, autosomal recessive 61||AR||2||7|
|SLITRK6||Deafness and myopia||AR||3||5|
|TBC1D24||Deafness, onychodystrophy, osteodystrophy, mental retardation, and seizures (DOORS) syndrome, Deafness, autosomal dominant, 65, Myoclonic epilepsy, infantile, familial, Epileptic encephalopathy, early infantile, 16, Deafness, autosomal recessive 86||AD/AR||43||55|
|TECTA||Deafness, autosomal dominant 8/12, Deafness, autosomal recessive 21||AD/AR||36||120|
|TJP2||Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, Hypercholanemia, familial, Deafness, autosomal dominant 51||AD/AR||25||27|
|TMC1||Deafness, autosomal dominant 36, Deafness, autosomal recessive 7||AD/AR||33||91|
|TPRN#||Deafness, autosomal recessive 79||AR||6||12|
|USH1C||Deafness, Usher syndrome, type IC||AR||45||51|
|WBP2||Deafness, autosomal recessive 107||AR||3||3|
|WFS1||Wolfram syndrome, Wolfram-like syndrome, autosomal dominant, Deafness, autosomal dominant 6/14/38, Cataract 41||AD/AR||69||362|
Some, or all, of the gene is duplicated in the genome. Read more.
The gene has suboptimal coverage (means <90% of the gene’s target nucleotides are covered at >20x with mapping quality score (MQ>20) reads), and/or the gene has exons listed under Test limitations section that are not included in the panel as they are not sufficiently covered with high quality sequence reads.
The sensitivity to detect variants may be limited in genes marked with an asterisk (*) or number sign (#). Due to possible limitations these genes may not be available as single gene tests.
Gene refers to the HGNC approved gene symbol; Inheritance refers to inheritance patterns such as autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), mitochondrial (mi), X-linked (XL), X-linked dominant (XLD) and X-linked recessive (XLR); ClinVar refers to the number of variants in the gene classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in this database (ClinVar); HGMD refers to the number of variants with possible disease association in the gene listed in Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). The list of associated, gene specific phenotypes are generated from CGD or Mitomap databases.
Non-coding variants covered by Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Panel
|Gene||Genomic location HG19||HGVS||RefSeq||RS-number|
The strengths of this test include:
- CAP accredited laboratory
- CLIA-certified personnel performing clinical testing in a CLIA-certified laboratory
- Powerful sequencing technologies, advanced target enrichment methods and precision bioinformatics pipelines ensure superior analytical performance
- Careful construction of clinically effective and scientifically justified gene panels
- Some of the panels include the whole mitochondrial genome (please see the Panel Content section)
- Our Nucleus online portal providing transparent and easy access to quality and performance data at the patient level
- ~2,000 non-coding disease causing variants in our clinical grade NGS assay for panels (please see ‘Non-coding disease causing variants covered by this panel’ in the Panel Content section)
- Our rigorous variant classification scheme
- Our systematic clinical interpretation workflow using proprietary software enabling accurate and traceable processing of NGS data
- Our comprehensive clinical statements
The following exons are not included in the panel as they are not sufficiently covered with high quality sequence reads: OTOA (22-27), OTOGL (21) and STRC (1-18). Note that we are able to detect variant in exons 19-29 of STRC, but our abilities are limited due to the high degree of homology that is shared between these exons and other regions of the genome. Whole gene deletions of STRC can and have been detected.
Genes with suboptimal coverage in our assay are marked with number sign (#) and genes with partial, or whole gene, segmental duplications in the human genome are marked with an asterisk (*) if they overlap with the UCSC pseudogene regions. Gene is considered to have suboptimal coverage when >90% of the gene’s target nucleotides are not covered at >20x with mapping quality score (MQ>20) reads. The technology may have limited sensitivity to detect variants in genes marked with these symbols (please see the Panel content table above).
This test does not detect the following:
- Complex inversions
- Gene conversions
- Balanced translocations
- Some of the panels include the whole mitochondrial genome but not all (please see the Panel Content section)
- Repeat expansion disorders unless specifically mentioned
- Non-coding variants deeper than ±20 base pairs from exon-intron boundary unless otherwise indicated (please see above Panel Content / non-coding variants covered by the panel).
This test may not reliably detect the following:
- Low level mosaicism in nuclear genes (variant with a minor allele fraction of 14.6% is detected with 90% probability)
- Stretches of mononucleotide repeats
- Low level heteroplasmy in mtDNA (>90% are detected at 5% level)
- Indels larger than 50bp
- Single exon deletions or duplications
- Variants within pseudogene regions/duplicated segments
- Some disease causing variants present in mtDNA are not detectable from blood, thus post-mitotic tissue such as skeletal muscle may be required for establishing molecular diagnosis.
The sensitivity of this test may be reduced if DNA is extracted by a laboratory other than Blueprint Genetics.
For additional information, please refer to the Test performance section.
The genes on the panel have been carefully selected based on scientific literature, mutation databases and our experience.
Our panels are sectioned from our high-quality, clinical grade NGS assay. Please see our sequencing and detection performance table for details regarding our ability to detect different types of alterations (Table).
Assays have been validated for various sample types including EDTA-blood, isolated DNA (excluding from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue), saliva and dry blood spots (filter cards). These sample types were selected in order to maximize the likelihood for high-quality DNA yield. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the assay used, referring healthcare professional, hospital and country. Plus analysis increases the likelihood of finding a genetic diagnosis for your patient, as large deletions and duplications cannot be detected using sequence analysis alone. Blueprint Genetics’ Plus Analysis is a combination of both sequencing and deletion/duplication (copy number variant (CNV)) analysis.
The performance metrics listed below are from an initial validation performed at our main laboratory in Finland. The performance metrics of our laboratory in Seattle, WA, are equivalent.
Performance of Blueprint Genetics high-quality, clinical grade NGS sequencing assay for panels.
|Sensitivity % (TP/(TP+FN)||Specificity %|
|Single nucleotide variants||99.89% (99,153/99,266)||>99.9999%|
|Insertions, deletions and indels by sequence analysis|
|1-10 bps||99.2% (7,745/7,806)||>99.9999%|
|11-50 bps||99.13% (2,524/2,546)||>99.9999%|
|Copy number variants (exon level dels/dups)|
|1 exon level deletion (heterozygous)||100% (20/20)||NA|
|1 exon level deletion (homozygous)||100% (5/5)||NA|
|1 exon level deletion (het or homo)||100% (25/25)||NA|
|2-7 exon level deletion (het or homo)||100% (44/44)||NA|
|1-9 exon level duplication (het or homo)||75% (6/8)||NA|
|Simulated CNV detection|
|5 exons level deletion/duplication||98.7%||100.00%|
|Microdeletion/-duplication sdrs (large CNVs, n=37))|
|Size range (0.1-47 Mb)||100% (25/25)|
|The performance presented above reached by Blueprint Genetics high-quality, clinical grade NGS sequencing assay with the following coverage metrics|
|Mean sequencing depth||143X|
|Nucleotides with >20x sequencing coverage (%)||99.86%|
Performance of Blueprint Genetics Mitochondrial Sequencing Assay.
|Sensitivity %||Specificity %|
|ANALYTIC VALIDATION (NA samples; n=4)|
|Single nucleotide variants|
|Heteroplasmic (45-100%)||100.0% (50/50)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (35-45%)||100.0% (87/87)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (25-35%)||100.0% (73/73)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (15-25%)||100.0% (77/77)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (10-15%)||100.0% (74/74)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (5-10%)||100.0% (3/3)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (<5%)||50.0% (2/4)||100.0%|
|CLINICAL VALIDATION (n=76 samples)|
|Single nucleotide variants n=2026 SNVs|
|Heteroplasmic (45-100%)||100.0% (1940/1940)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (35-45%)||100.0% (4/4)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (25-35%)||100.0% (3/3)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (15-25%)||100.0% (3/3)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (10-15%)||100.0% (9/9)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (5-10%)||92.3% (12/13)||99.98%|
|Heteroplasmic (<5%)||88.9% (48/54)||99.93%|
|Insertions and deletions by sequence analysis n=40 indels|
|Heteroplasmic (45-100%) 1-10bp||100.0% (32/32)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (5-45%) 1-10bp||100.0% (3/3)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (<5%) 1-10bp||100.0% (5/5)||99,997%|
|SIMULATION DATA /(mitomap mutations)|
|Insertions, and deletions 1-24 bps by sequence analysis; n=17|
|Homoplasmic (100%) 1-24bp||100.0% (17/17)||99.98%|
|Heteroplasmic (50%)||100.0% (17/17)||99.99%|
|Heteroplasmic (25%)||100.0% (17/17)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (20%)||100.0% (17/17)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (15%)||100.0% (17/17)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (10%)||94.1% (16/17)||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (5%)||94.1% (16/17)||100.0%|
|Copy number variants (separate artifical mutations; n=1500)|
|Homoplasmic (100%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb||100.0%||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (50%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb||100.0%||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (30%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb||100.0%||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (20%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb||99.7%||100.0%|
|Heteroplasmic (10%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb||99.0%||100.0%|
|The performance presented above reached by following coverage metrics at assay level (n=66)|
|Mean of medians||Median of medians|
|Mean sequencing depth MQ0 (clinical)||18224X||17366X|
|Nucleotides with >1000x MQ0 sequencing coverage (%) (clinical)||100%|
|rho zero cell line (=no mtDNA), mean sequencing depth||12X|
The target region for each gene includes coding exons and ±20 base pairs from the exon-intron boundary. In addition, the panel includes non-coding and regulatory variants if listed above (Non-coding variants covered by the panel). Some regions of the gene(s) may be removed from the panel if specifically mentioned in the ‘Test limitations” section above. If the test includes the mitochondrial genome the target region gene list contains the mitochondrial genes. The sequencing data generated in our laboratory is analyzed with our proprietary data analysis and annotation pipeline, integrating state-of-the art algorithms and industry-standard software solutions. Incorporation of rigorous quality control steps throughout the workflow of the pipeline ensures the consistency, validity and accuracy of results. Our pipeline is streamlined to maximize sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. We have incorporated a number of reference population databases and mutation databases including, but not limited, to 1000 Genomes Project, gnomAD, ClinVar and HGMD into our clinical interpretation software to make the process effective and efficient. For missense variants, in silico variant prediction tools such as SIFT, PolyPhen,MutationTaster are used to assist with variant classification. Through our online ordering and statement reporting system, Nucleus, ordering providers have access to the details of the analysis, including patient specific sequencing metrics, a gene level coverage plot and a list of regions with suboptimal coverage (<20X for nuclear genes and <1000X for mtDNA) if applicable. This reflects our mission to build fully transparent diagnostics where ordering providers can easily visualize the crucial details of the analysis process.
We provide customers with the most comprehensive clinical report available on the market. Clinical interpretation requires a fundamental understanding of clinical genetics and genetic principles. At Blueprint Genetics, our PhD molecular geneticists, medical geneticists, and clinical consultants prepare the clinical statement together by evaluating the identified variants in the context of the phenotypic information provided in the requisition form. Our goal is to provide clinically meaningful statements that are understandable for all medical professionals regardless of whether they have formal training in genetics.
Variant classification is the cornerstone of clinical interpretation and resulting patient management decisions. Our classifications follow the ACMG guideline 2015.
The final step in the analysis is orthogonal confirmation. Sequence and copy number variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are confirmed using bi-directional Sanger sequencing or by orthogonal methods such as qPCR/ddPCR when they do not meet our stringent NGS quality metrics for a true positive call.
Our clinical statement includes tables for sequencing and copy number variants that include basic variant information (genomic coordinates, HGVS nomenclature, zygosity, allele frequencies, in silico predictions, OMIM phenotypes, and classification of the variant). In addition, the statement includes detailed descriptions of the variant, gene, and phenotype(s) including the role of the specific gene in human disease, the mutation profile, information about the gene’s variation in population cohorts, and detailed information about related phenotypes. We also provide links to the references, abstracts, and variant databases used to help ordering providers further evaluate the reported findings if desired. The conclusion summarizes all of the existing information and provides our rationale for the classification of the variant.
Identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in dominant disorders or their combinations in different alleles in recessive disorders are considered molecular confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. In these cases, family member testing can be used for risk stratification. We do not recommend using variants of uncertain significance (VUS) for family member risk stratification or patient management. Genetic counseling is recommended.
Our interpretation team analyzes millions of variants from thousands of individuals with rare diseases. Our internal database and our understanding of variants and related phenotypes increases with every case analyzed. Our laboratory is therefore well-positioned to re-classify previously reported variants as new information becomes available. If a variant previously reported by Blueprint Genetics is re-classified, our laboratory will issue a follow-up statement to the original ordering healthcare provider at no additional cost, according to our latest follow-up reporting policy.
- Action on Hearing Loss
- Alford RL et al. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis ofhearingloss. Genet Med. 2014 Apr;16(4):347-55.
- American Society for Deaf Children
- British Deaf Association
- Cortical Foundation
- GeneReviews - BOR Syndrome
- GeneReviews - Baraitser-Winter syndrome
- GeneReviews - Deafness and Hereditary Hearing Loss
- GeneReviews - Usher Syndrome, type I
- GeneReviews - Usher Syndrome, type II
- Hearing Link
- Hearing Loss Association of America
- Hereditary Hearing loss
- NORD - BOR Syndrome
- NORD - Usher Syndrome
- National Association of the Deaf US
- Sloan-Heggen CM et al. Navigating genetic diagnostics in patients with hearing loss. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016 Dec;28(6):705-712.
- The Cain Foundation for BOR syndrome
- Usher Syndrome Coalition