Retinitis Pigmentosa Panel
Test code: OP0901
The Blueprint Genetics Retinitis Pigmentosa Panel is an 80 gene test for genetic diagnostics of patients with clinical suspicion of retinitis pigmentosa.
The panel covers genes associated with autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant and X-linked forms of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Clinical utility of this panel is estimated to be 57% for patients with autosomal recessive or dominant RP and 85% for patients with X-linked RP. Differential diagnosis includes choroideremia, gyrate atrophy of choroid and retina and X-linked retinoschisis. For patients with syndromic RP, we recommend to choose Retinal Dystrophy Panel.
About Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of inherited disorders in which abnormalities of the photoreceptors (rods and cones) or the retinal pigment epithelium lead to progressive visual loss. RP can be classified as nonsyndromic or syndromic. Nonsyndromic RP is extremely heterogeneous, both clinically and genetically, and it may be inherited in an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked manner. Autosomal dominant RP is estimated to account for 15-25% of cases, autosomal recessive 5-20% and X-linked 5-15% (GeneReviews). Sporadic cases are common (40-50%). Severity is partly correlated with the pattern of inheritance with X-linked cases having the most severe course. The major causative genes are RHO, accounting for approximately 28% of autosomal dominant RP and RPGR, which is estimated to explain 70% of X-linked RP. Prevalence of RP is reported to be 1:4,000 to 1:5,000. The major forms of syndromic RP are Usher syndrome and Bardet-Biedl syndrome.
Results in 3-4 weeks. We do not offer a maternal cell contamination (MCC) test at the moment. We offer prenatal testing only for cases where the maternal cell contamination studies (MCC) are done by a local genetic laboratory. Read more: http://blueprintgenetics.com/faqs/#prenatal
|ABCA4||Stargardt disease, Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy, Retinal dystrophy, early-onset severe, Fundus flavimaculatus||AR||203||1012|
|ABHD12||Polyneuropathy, hearing loss, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa, and cataract||AR||10||15|
|AIPL1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD/AR||8||73|
|ARL6||Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa||AR||9||21|
|BBS2||Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa||AR||30||84|
|BEST1||Microcornea, rod-cone dystrophy, cataract, and posterior staphyloma, Vitreoretinochoroidopathy||AD/AR||31||269|
|C8ORF37||Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy||AR||4|
|CDHR1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy||AR||9||33|
|CEP290*||Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Leber congenital amaurosis, Joubert syndrome, Senior-Loken syndrome, Meckel syndrome||AR||79||252|
|CLN3||Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal||AR||69||64|
|CLRN1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Usher syndrome||AR||14||32|
|CRB1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Pigmented paravenous chorioretinal atrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD/AR||31||291|
|CRX||Cone rod dystrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD/AR||22||87|
|CYP4V2||Retinitis pigmentosa, Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy||AR||30||75|
|FLVCR1||Ataxia, posterior column, with retinitis pigmentosa||AR||4||12|
|GUCY2D||Cone rod dystrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD/AR||18||214|
|HK1||Hemolytic anemia, nonspherocytic, due to hexokinase deficiency||AD/AR||5||8|
|IMPDH1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD||6||20|
|LCA5||Leber congenital amaurosis||AR||7||45|
|LRAT||Retinitis pigmentosa, juvenile, Leber congenital amaurosis, Retinitis punctata albescens, Retinal-dystrophy, early-onset severe||AR||7||18|
|MVK||Mevalonic aciduria, Hyper-IgD syndrome||AR||27||168|
|NMNAT1||Leber congenital amaurosis||AR||11||64|
|NR2E3||Retinitis pigmentosa, Enhanced S-cone syndrome||AD/AR||12||74|
|NRL||Retinitis pigmentosa, Clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration||AD/AR||7||21|
|OAT||Gyrate atrophy of choroid and retina||AR||62||69|
|OFD1||Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa, Orofaciodigital syndrome, Joubert syndrome||XL||129||148|
|PANK2||Hypoprebetalipoproteinemia, acanthocytosis, retinitis pigmentosa, and pallidal degeneration, Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation||AD/AR||17||148|
|PDE6B||Retinitis pigmentosa, Night blindness, congenital stationary||AD/AR||19||100|
|PEX2||Zellweger syndrome, Peroxisome biogenesis disorder||AR||8||18|
|PEX7||Refsum disease, Rhizomelic CDP type 1||AR||17||51|
|PROM1||Stargardt disease, Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy, Macular dystrophy, retinal,||AD/AR||10||58|
|PRPH2||Choriodal dystrophy, central areolar, Macular dystrophy, vitelliform, Retinitis pigmentosa, Retinitis punctata albescens, Macula dystrophy, patterned||AD/Digenic||28||157|
|RDH12||Retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis||AD/AR||20||95|
|RHO||Retinitis pigmentosa, Night blindness, congenital stationary, Retinitis punctata albescens||AD/AR||50||197|
|RLBP1||Newfoundland rod-cone dystrophy, Fundus albipunctatus, Bothnia retinal dystrophy, Retinitis punctata albescens||AR||7||33|
|RPE65||Retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis||AR||16||170|
|RPGRIP1||Cone rod dystrophy, Leber congenital amaurosis||AR||23||117|
|SAG||Retinitis pigmentosa, Oguchi disease||AR||5||14|
|SEMA4A||Retinitis pigmentosa, Cone rod dystrophy||AR||2||13|
|SPATA7||Leber congenital amaurosis, Retitinitis pigmentosa||AR||10||29|
|TTC8||Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa||AR||5||16|
|TTPA||Ataxia with isolated vitamin E deficiency||AR||19||28|
|TULP1||Retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis||AR||19||66|
|USH1C||Deafness, Usher syndrome||AR||13||45|
|USH2A||Usher syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa||AR||147||924|
|WDR19||Retinitis pigmentosa, Nephronophthisis, Short -rib thoracic dysplasia with or without polydactyly, Senior-Loken syndrome, Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 1, Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 2, Asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia (ATD; Jeune)||AD/AR||16||25|
*Some regions of the gene are duplicated in the genome leading to limited sensitivity within the regions. Thus, low-quality variants are filtered out from the duplicated regions and only high-quality variants confirmed by other methods are reported out. Read more.
Gene, refers to HGNC approved gene symbol; Inheritance to inheritance patterns such as autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL); ClinVar, refers to a number of variants in the gene classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in ClinVar (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/); HGMD, refers to a number of variants with possible disease association in the gene listed in Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/). The list of associated (gene specific) phenotypes are generated from CDG (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/CGD/) or Orphanet (http://www.orpha.net/) databases.
|Gene||Genomic location HG19||HGVS||RefSeq||RS-number||Comment||Reference|
Blueprint Genetics offers a comprehensive Retinitis Pigmentosa Panel that covers classical genes associated with choroideremia, gyrate atrophy of choroid and retina, retinitis pigmentosa, Stargardt disease and x-linked retinoschisis. The genes are carefully selected based on the existing scientific evidence, our experience and most current mutation databases. Candidate genes are excluded from this first-line diagnostic test. The test does not recognise balanced translocations or complex inversions, and it may not detect low-level mosaicism. The test should not be used for analysis of sequence repeats or for diagnosis of disorders caused by mutations in the mitochondrial DNA.
Analytical validation is a continuous process at Blueprint Genetics. Our mission is to improve the quality of the sequencing process and each modification is followed by our standardized validation process. Average sensitivity and specificity in Blueprint NGS Panels is 99.3% and 99.9% for detecting SNPs. Sensitivity to for indels vary depending on the size of the alteration: 1-10bps (96.0%), 11-20 bps (88.4%) and 21-30 bps (66.7%). The longest detected indel was 46 bps by sequence analysis. Detection limit for Del/Dup (CNV) analysis varies through the genome depending on exon size, sequencing coverage and sequence content. The sensitivity is 71.5% for single exon deletions and duplications and 99% for three exons’ deletions and duplications. We have validated the assays for different starting materials including EDTA-blood, isolated DNA (no FFPE) and saliva that all provide high-quality results. The diagnostic yield varies substantially depending on the used assay, referring healthcare professional, hospital and country. Blueprint Genetics’ Plus Analysis (Seq+Del/Dup) maximizes the chance to find molecular genetic diagnosis for your patient although Sequence Analysis or Del/Dup Analysis may be cost-effective first line test if your patient’s phenotype is suggestive for a specific mutation profile.
The sequencing data generated in our laboratory is analyzed with our proprietary data analysis and annotation pipeline, integrating state-of-the art algorithms and industry-standard software solutions. Incorporation of rigorous quality control steps throughout the workflow of the pipeline ensures the consistency, validity and accuracy of results. The highest relevance in the reported variants is achieved through elimination of false positive findings based on variability data for thousands of publicly available human reference sequences and validation against our in-house curated mutation database as well as the most current and relevant human mutation databases. Reference databases currently used are the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org), the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP; http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS), the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC; http://exac.broadinstitute.org), ClinVar database of genotype-phenotype associations (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar) and the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk). The consequence of variants in coding and splice regions are estimated using the following in silico variant prediction tools: SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org), Polyphen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org).
Through our online ordering and statement reporting system, Nucleus, the customer can access specific details of the analysis of the patient. This includes coverage and quality specifications and other relevant information on the analysis. This represents our mission to build fully transparent diagnostics where the customer gains easy access to crucial details of the analysis process.
In addition to our cutting-edge patented sequencing technology and proprietary bioinformatics pipeline, we also provide the customers with the best-informed clinical report on the market. Clinical interpretation requires fundamental clinical and genetic understanding. At Blueprint Genetics our geneticists and clinicians, who together evaluate the results from the sequence analysis pipeline in the context of phenotype information provided in the requisition form, prepare the clinical statement. Our goal is to provide clinically meaningful statements that are understandable for all medical professionals, even without training in genetics.
Variants reported in the statement are always classified using the Blueprint Genetics Variant Classification Scheme modified from the ACMG guidelines (Richards et al. 2015), which has been developed by evaluating existing literature, databases and with thousands of clinical cases analyzed in our laboratory. Variant classification forms the corner stone of clinical interpretation and following patient management decisions. Our statement also includes allele frequencies in reference populations and in silico predictions. We also provide PubMed IDs to the articles or submission numbers to public databases that have been used in the interpretation of the detected variants. In our conclusion, we summarize all the existing information and provide our rationale for the classification of the variant.
A final component of the analysis is the Sanger confirmation of the variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic. This does not only bring confidence to the results obtained by our NGS solution but establishes the mutation specific test for family members. Sanger sequencing is also used occasionally with other variants reported in the statement. In the case of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) we do not recommend risk stratification based on the genetic finding. Furthermore, in the case VUS we do not recommend use of genetic information in patient management or genetic counseling. For some cases Blueprint Genetics offers a special free of charge service to investigate the role of identified VUS.
We constantly follow genetic literature adapting new relevant information and findings to our diagnostics. Relevant novel discoveries can be rapidly translated and adopted into our diagnostics without delay. These processes ensure that our diagnostic panels and clinical statements remain the most up-to-date on the market.
Choose an analysis method
ICD & CPT codes
Commonly used ICD-10 codes when ordering the Retinitis Pigmentosa Panel
Accepted sample types
- EDTA blood, min. 1 ml
- Purified DNA, min. 5μg
- Saliva (Oragene DNA OG-500 kit)
Label the sample tube with your patient’s name, date of birth and the date of sample collection.
Note that we do not accept DNA samples isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue.